Case Law Details
Case Name : Shri Thomas Eapen Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Cochin
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Shri Thomas Eapen Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)
The assessee offered income u/s. 44AD, the assessee being a small trader in medicine. There is no dispute that the assessee falls under the provision of sec. 44AD since the turnover of the assessee is less than Rs. 1 crore from eligible business. The Assessing Officer also accepted that the assessee’s case falls under the purview of section 44AD and computed the income declared by the assessee at Rs.3,37,160/-and thereafter made addition towards undisclosed profit u/s. 68 of the Act. In other words, the Assessi
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
While it is clear order, stating that, once the 44AD is availed to file return, and 8% income is declared, AO cannot add any income, irrespective of what is actual profit. So, in nutshell, there is no need to declare actual income, as no audit is done. Only important is the actual receipts should match with the receipts you are offering in the return. Law is clear, judgements are clear, then why some CA’s keep telling that actual income should be offered ?.