Case Law Details
Case Name : Smt. Kavita Chandra Vs CIT (Appeals) (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 421 of 2016 (O & M)
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/03/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Punjab and Haryana HC
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
After examining the entire evidence on record, the Tribunal has upheld the finding recorded by CIT(A) with regard to cash deposit to the tune of Rs. 14,20,212/- as unexplained. It has been categorically recorded by the Tribunal that out of the 33 withdrawals, only two withdrawals of Rs. 2 lacs each from Bank of Rajasthan and ICICI Bank were made in cash. The rest were all withdrawals by cheque – small amounts made mostly by an employee of the assessee. Similarly, in many cases, small amounts were withdrawn two or three times on a single day by different person
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Dear Sir,
Thanks for highlighting this issue.
We are Advertising Agency and last two months I am trying to raise this issue .
It is great if you can help to arrest this problem.
Thanks and Regards
Sir, appartently this was written before the announcement of GST @ 28% on cinema tickets. It is a huge negative for the industry, with local bodies, being allowed to collect additional taxes/cess on cinema tickets.