Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs A. Kulanthaivel (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs A. Kulanthaivel (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai held that addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act towards cash deposits not reflected in bank account details cannot be sustained since the income doesn’t belong to assessee in the individual status but the income belong to HUF of the assessee. Facts- The AO received information that the assessee has made cash deposit of Rs.4,66,49,320/- in the bank account, however, the same was not reflected in bank account details. Hence, AO added the same u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act. CIT(A) considered the submissions and deleted the addition....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930