Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s Shivnandan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
The logic that seems to have been applied by the revenue authorities is that the petitioner was a businessman and it would be imprudent for a businessman to advance a sum of Rs. 1.6 crores as in the case of W.P.(C) 6265/2013 to Smart Tourist Private Limited and to not charge anything in return. The explanation sought to be given by the petitioner in both these cases was that the advances were made in the course of their business and it is not at all necessary that an advance given by a businessman at all times must have an element of interest also.
There are various other considerations which ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
One Comment
Cancel reply
I think in future the department would be on the boar of business man and instruct how they will deal with the transactions.