Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Veeranam Thirumalai Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Veeranam Thirumalai Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) In this case, the AO reopened the assessment due to cash deposits and estimated income at 8% of turnover, resulting in an addition of ₹22.98 lakh. The CIT(A) confirmed the addition ex-parte. Before the ITAT, the assessee demonstrated that: A return was filed in response to notice u/s 148, Detailed records such as cash book, bank book, purchase and sales registers were submitted, and The AO wrongly ignored these records, treating them as pertaining to another year. Crucially, the Tribunal referred to the profit trend table  showing: Profit margins...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930