Case Law Details
V. R. Muthu & Bros Vs V.V.V. and Sons Edible Oils Limited (Madras High Court)
This judgment revolves around the issuance of summons by the Commercial Tax Department to two parties, V. R. Muthu & Bros and V.V.V. and Sons Edible Oils Limited, under Rule 16(1) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax (TNVAT) Rules, 2007. The summons were issued in Form PP, requesting various financial documents for scrutiny regarding the correctness of the returns submitted by the dealers.
The petitioners challenged these summonses, arguing that they, as assesses who had filed regular returns, could only be summoned in accordance with Section 22(3) of the TNVAT Act, 2006, which pertains to detailed scrutiny by the Commissioner. They contended that summonses in Form PP apply to third parties, not assesses whose assessments are deemed to be completed.
However, the Commercial Tax Department justified the summonses, citing Rule 10(11) of the TNVAT Rules, 2007, which allows for detailed scrutiny of accounts based on stratified random sampling by the Commissioner. They argued that Section 81 of the TNVAT Act, 2006, empowers them to summon any person, including dealers, for the production of documents.
The court analyzed the relevant provisions of the TNVAT Act and Rules and observed that while Section 22(3) deals with detailed scrutiny by the Commissioner, Section 81 grants wide-ranging powers to summon witnesses and documents, including from dealers. It noted that the purpose of detailed scrutiny under Section 22(3) is to ensure the correctness of returns and that summonses are necessary for this purpose.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
