Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : S.A.B. Engg Works Vs State of U.P. and another (Allahabad High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

S.A.B. Engg Works Vs State of U.P. and another (Allahabad High Court)

Court Quashes Swift GST Recovery, Cites Procedural Breach and Circular Violation’ Under provisions of Section 112of CHST Act, 2017 on deposit of 10% of the demand, the rest of the demand gets stayed under sub-section (9) of Section 112 of the Act and the limitation for filing appeal is three months.

In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside a recovery action initiated by the tax authorities under Section 79 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST A

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30