Annalakshmi Stores Vs Deputy State Tax (Madras High Court)
In the case of Annalakshmi Stores vs. Deputy State Tax, Madras High Court addressed writ petitions challenging assessment orders under Section 63 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) concerning specific assessment periods. The primary issue revolved around the cancellation of GST registration of Annalakshmi Stores with retrospective effect from 31st August 2017 due to non-filing of returns continuously for six months. The petitioner contended that they were unaware of the issuance of notices and show cause notices because these documents were uploaded using a temporary ID, which they did not have access to.
The petitioner’s counsel argued that under Section 63 and Rule 100 of the TNGST Rules, issuance of a show cause notice in Form GST ASMT-14 is mandatory for proceedings initiated under Section 63. They emphasized that uploading such notices on a temporary ID does not constitute proper service as per Section 169 of the GST enactments applicable. It was further highlighted that despite efforts to file statutory appeals against the tax demands, they were unable to do so due to the use of the temporary ID.
On behalf of the government, the learned Additional Government Pleader countered that the petitioner’s email ID and mobile number, as per their original GST registration, were used for the temporary ID. They argued that the petitioner had access to this temporary ID as the relevant password was communicated to the registered email and mobile number.
