Case Law Details
Anurag Garodia Vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors (Calcutta High Court)
The Calcutta High Court’s recent judgment in the case of Anurag Garodia Vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors highlights the critical issue of considering applications for hearing extension or adjournment in GST proceedings. This case underscores the obligation of GST authorities to adhere to the principles of natural justice by ensuring that taxpayers are given a fair chance to present their case. The ruling provides valuable insights into the handling of show-cause notices under Section 73(9) of the GST Act, particularly regarding the timelines for submitting responses and the importance of granting personal hearings.
The petitioner, Anurag Garodia, challenged an order issued under Section 73(9) of the GST Act, which resulted from a show-cause notice served on him. The core contention was the failure of the GST authorities to consider the petitioner’s application for an extension of time to submit his response, largely due to disruptions caused by the Durga Puja festivities and subsequent office closures. Despite the petitioner’s efforts to seek an extension and a personal hearing upon the office’s reopening, the authorities proceeded to pass the final order without addressing these requests.
The court scrutinized the provisions of the GST Act, particularly Section 75(5), which empowers the proper officer to grant adjournments upon showing sufficient cause. The judgment emphasized that such discretion should be exercised judiciously, not arbitrarily, to uphold the principles of natural justice. The court found the final order to be vitiated due to the authority’s failure to consider the petitioner’s application for an extension and request for a personal hearing, marking it as a colorable exercise of power.
The Calcutta High Court’s ruling in Anurag Garodia Vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Ors serves as a pivotal reminder of the GST authorities’ duties to consider hearing extensions and adjournment applications diligently. By setting aside the impugned order and directing the petitioner to submit his response, coupled with instructions for the authorities to provide a personal hearing, the judgment reinforces the importance of ensuring fairness in administrative proceedings. This case acts as a cautionary tale for GST authorities, urging them to respect taxpayers’ rights to a fair hearing and the opportunity to respond to show-cause notices, thus safeguarding the principles of natural justice in the realm of GST compliance and dispute resolution.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
