Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subhash Kumar Singh Vs State of Assam and Anr. (Gauhati High Court)
Appeal Number : Bail Appeal No. 1631/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/08/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Subhash Kumar Singh Vs State of Assam and Anr. (Gauhati High Court)

It has been, prima facie, found that the evasion of tax was more than Rs. 5 crores which necessitated the arrest of the Petitioner in compliance of the provision of Section 132 (1) (i) of the Assam GST Act, 2017. Hence, the argument put forth by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the arrest of the Petitioner is illegal and arbitrary is devoid of any merit. This Court has also taken note of the fact, as appears from the materials in the case record, that the Petitioner evaded tax worth more than Rs. 5 crores and the investigating agency has collected materials to show that the Petitioner is the originator of the fake invoices, etc and direct documentary evidence is there in the record about the active involvement of the Petitioner in tax evasion. The investigation of the case is still continuing in order to ascertain the location of the godown and to examine other related witnesses and also for calculation of interest in view of the revised notification (the notification is specifically referred to in para 34) regarding rate of interest which keeps varying from time to time. Moreover, if the Petitioner is enlarged on bail at this stage, he is more than likely to hamper the investigation and/or tamper evidence which may likely to compromise with the entire investigation.

Before parting with the record, I wish to make it clear that any observations/views/opinion expressed in this order are only for the limited purpose of deciding this bail application and shall not impact the case in the trial or in any other proceeding arising out of this case.

In view of the discussions above, and taking into account, the fact that to carry out further investigation as per the observations made by this Court in the later part of Para 35 as regards requirement of further investigation, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the Petitioner, at this stage.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER/JUDGEMENT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031