Case Law Details
Case Name : In re Tube Investment of India Limited (AAR GST Uttarakhand)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
AAR Uttarakhand Advance Rulings
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
In re Tube Investment of India Limited (AAR GST Uttarakhand)
A. Whether the nominal amount of recoveries made by the Applicant from the employees who are provided food in the factory canteen would be considered as a “Supply” by the applicant under the provisions of Section 7 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017?
Answer: Yes, it is a “Supply” under the provisions of Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017.
B. Whether GST is applicable on the amount recovered from the employees for the food provided in the factory canteen or on the amount paid by the Applicant to the Cantee...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Why It can not be resolved once at for all. So many advance ruling by so many states and so many divergent views ? Its ridiculous.