Introduction
One important component of the Indian economy is the corporate debt market, which is divided into two parts: The government securities market and the corporate debt market are most common forms of the money market. Whereas, the corporate bond market in India is still underdeveloped and illiquid; it often uses a safe-haven AAA bond for almost all its issuances as well as trading. There are even signs of its expansion in the main and the secondary markets, but this market remains an object of numerous serious adversities like the lack of information among dealers, extremely high stamp duty costs, and low levels of the availability of new types of debt securities. Relative to both, developed and emerging market economies, the size of India’s corporate debt market remains comparatively small. Long-term debt or bank credit is preferred and the use of debentures is almost insignificant in the market. The adverse condition and deficiency in corporate loan market have confined the financing sources of the corporate sectors and have hampered the growth and development of the business. Hence, having solved these problems and being in the process of the formation of the Indian corporate debt market, based on the present study, there is a need to launch market and regulatory trends. The structural composition of India’s corporate debt comprises bonds and debentures, and bank and monetary institutions, centre and state government borrowers, commercial papers and inter-corporate ones, outside business loans, and supplier’s deferred credit. Concerning corporate debt market it has been ascertained that problems like use of long term debt and bank credit, inadequacy of appropriate short-term debt instruments are chronic illness of corporate debt market, due to these reasons; there is need to apply overall structural changes to revive and transform the corporate debt market as one of the most active markets.
Challenges for corporate debt market in India–
Underdeveloped and illiquid nature: EDS is still relatively small in comparison to the government securities market in India and it is even underdeveloped and inactive regarding its debt market. As a result, there is reliance on only very risky AAA bond for each of the issuances and trading.
Regulatory developments: SEBI issued regulations in relation to the issue and listing of debt securities in the year 2008. The initial purpose of these regulations was to achieve the objective of the Company to introduce simpler regulations for the issuance and listing of non-convertible debt securities (excepting the government securities) of any company, public region venture or statutory companies.
Recommendations: The Institute of corporate Secretaries of India has also outlines recommendation on how the Indian corporate bond market can be improved. These are the issues like handling the challenges faced by the purchaser, high stamp duty costs, and absence of innovative debt securities. The recommendations that have been made stress the importance of compliance with proper governance rules and legal/mandatory regulations.
Technology and market design: In the post liberalization phase, great changes have occurred in India’s securities markets in areas of market structure, technology, agreement processes, introduction of new instruments, etc. The market, however, seems to have a large scope of growth the government securities market as well as equity market and particularly the corporate debt market where for long-term funding, it requires more attention to develop.
International comparisons: Various streams exist that have influenced the global corporate debt market including India where other markets like the Japan’s ‘Abenomics’; a policy to eliminate deflation and attain the target of 2 percent inflation and 2 percent growth through productivity. This underscore the fact that all changes being made nowadays to the markets should be comprehensive to give the corporate bond market a competitive and mature market.
The issues mentioned above and the enforcement of the recommended procedures can transform the Indian corporate debt market into a liquid, efficient, and transparent market that fosters long–term financing for the progression of the economic system.
Regulatory Framework
SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008 (ILDS)
ILDS stands for Issue and Listing of Debt Securities which were issued by SEBI for providing standard pattern about the issuance and listing of non-convertible debt securities (except the Government securities) issued with the help of any employer, public place venture, or statutory bodies or any other incorporated group. The need for the policy has arise in a bid to protect investors and put in place an efficient and clean debt securities market. The rules pertain to list of obligations, requirements to disclose information, as well as qualifying for entities that issue debt instruments. The rules also contain requirements and recommendation on the manner in which debt securities are to be quoted on a stock exchange or in the trading platform. Their provisions does not extend to the issue and list of securitized debt units and safety receipts there is already a separate legal treatment for it.
Thanks to the recommendations of the ILDS, a relatively less bureaucratic process concerning the issuing and listing various debt securities has been possible in India. Apart from enhancing investors protection, the regulations have played an important role of creating proper and efficient market of debts securities. The regulations have also offered reference for the debt securities list of stock exchanges and trading platforms, so that the market liquidity has improved. Sometimes the rules have been altered in order to correspond with the shifts that have occurred in the market and concerning the difficult situations that have emerged with the market.
The rules and regulations formulated with the help of SEBI mainly addresses the aspects of eligibility to issue the securities, the information that should be disclosed to the public, and the procedural responsibilities that must be complied with by the entities issuing the debt securities. However, certain guidelines are available in this regard under the SEBI issued and listing of debt securities regulation 2008 (ILDS) Initially. The ILDS regulations state that the following elements are pertinent:The ILDS regulations state that the following elements are pertinent:
Eligibility Criteria: The policies relate to the emission and list of non-convertible debt securities, other than government papers. These can be issued through any company, state owned enterprise, society and other related organizations. The regulation does not apply to the issue and list of securitized debt units and safety receipts because they have a separate set of rules for regulations.
Disclosure Requirements: Issuing organisations that offer debt securities to the public are mandated to presenting compliance with the disclosure regulations as outlined in the ILDS policies. These specifications ensure that the investors are provided with proper and honest information about the issuer, the debt security as well as the terms and conditions of the offer.
Listing Requirements: It also offers some guidelines on the listing of debt securities on the stock exchanges and or the platform for trading. It is thus possible to boost market activity and ensure the efficient trading of debt securities whose market is more sensitive to the efficiency of the market intermediaries.
Conclusion
The Indian corporate debt market faces formidable challenges stemming from its underdeveloped nature, regulatory complexities, and liquidity constraints. Addressing these issues requires concerted efforts from regulators, market participants, and policymakers. By implementing recommended reforms and learning from global experiences, India can transform its corporate debt market into a liquid, efficient, and transparent ecosystem that fosters economic growth and stability.