Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 2226 Results

Expenses charged to farmers for harvesting and transportation of sugarcane not liable to service tax

Case Name : Talala Taluka Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandali Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 10372 of 2013-DB
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/12/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3902) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Person supplying main supply on principal-to-principal basis cannot be intermediary

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Tax Vs Singtel Global India Private Limited (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 52609 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/12/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3902) CESTAT Delhi (905)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Notification No. 12/2003-S.T not specifies that goods have to necessarily be supplied under invoices

Case Name : N R Engineering & Contractors Vs C.S.T. -Service Tax (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 491 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/11/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3902) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Cenvat credit eligible on cab service wherein travel date is prior to 01.04.2011

Case Name : Warburg Pincus India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Asst. Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 85062 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/11/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3902) CESTAT Mumbai (507)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Self-assessment of tax liability during Audit before June 30, 2019 can be considerd as Quantification’ under SVLDR Scheme, 2019

Case Name : Win Power Engineering (P) Ltd. Vs Designated Committee (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. Nos. 11785, 12957 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/11/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13917) Madras High Court (1753)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Period of limitation u/s 11B doesn’t apply to refund claim filed for taxes paid under mistake

Case Name : Raheja Regency Cooperative Housing Society ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 85076 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/12/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3902) CESTAT Mumbai (507)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Penalty leviable could not exceed the amount for Compounding of Offence under GST Act

Case Name : Britt Worldwide India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax-VII (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 86204 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/09/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3902) CESTAT Mumbai (507)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Refund claim u/r 5 of CCR, 2004 cannot be denied on the ground of no nexus between the input service and output service exported

Case Name : Sequoia Capital India Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 87174 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/12/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3902) CESTAT Mumbai (507)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Department cannot deny interest on refund once refund clam is sanctioned

Case Name : Rosy Blue India Private Limited vs. Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 28 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/09/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13917) Bombay High Court (1879)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Issuance of revised Form-3 for re-examination is contrary to Section 128 of said scheme

Case Name : ACNielsen Research Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : WP (L) No. 6716 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/11/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13917) Bombay High Court (1879)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031