Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 3137 Results

Supreme Court interprets choice of SIAC Rules as exclusion to the applicability of Part I of the Indian Arbitration Act

Case Name : Yograj Infrastructure Ltd Vs Ssang Yong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd., (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 7562 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/09/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

SC Decision on Fate of Arbitration Clause in unregistered Agreement with improper stamp duty

Case Name : SMS Tea Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Chandmari Tea Co. Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 5820 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

In case of bounced cheque the magistrate in the place where the cheque was drawn and where the drawee bank is situated has jurisdiction to deal with the complaint

Case Name : Shree Raj Travels & Tours Ltd. & Ors. Vs Destination Of The World (Subcontinent) Private Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : CRL. M.C. 1056/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/09/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Delhi High Court (3368)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Merely because commission is paid to the employees, they do not cease to be employees under the PF Act

Case Name : Focused Corporate Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 10236 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Madras High Court (1758)

New partners can not be held guilty for cheque issued by old partners – SC

Case Name : Sarojben Ashwinkumar Shah etc. Vs. State of Gujarat & ANR. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Criminal Appeal Nos. 1554- 1557 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

SC upholds tax and penalty on Multi System Operators

Case Name : Indus-ind Media & Communication Ltd. & ANR. Vs. Mamlatdar & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Criminal Appeal Nos. 7026- 7029 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

Earnest money forfeited as per terms of tender for not entering into contract can not be refunded – SC

Case Name : State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. M/s. Malik Traders (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 7033 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

Provident Fund (EPF) contribution on certain allowances – Applicability?

Case Name : Reynolds Pens India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. Nos. 15823, 22480, 25442 and 25443 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/06/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Madras High Court (1758)

Electricity tariff is leviable at Commercial rates on Residential premises used by advocates for Commercial Activities

Case Name : Rajendra G. Shah V/s Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 6891 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Bombay High Court (1879)

PF contributions need to be deducted for training period of Junior Employees

Case Name : BSNL Vs Union of India & others (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.No. 21520,21782 and 21783/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Madras High Court (1758)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031