Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22499 Results

Mere non acceptance of Assessees Legal Claim will not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income

Case Name : Strides Arcolab Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 6233/Mum/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/06/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2000- 01
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

A business centre cannot be said to be a `house’ for purposes of clause (3) of section 2(ea) of Wealth-tax Act

Case Name : Cravatex Ltd. Vs. Addl. CIT (ITAT Mumbbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 7381/Mum/02 WTA No. 42/Mum/03 WTA No. 38/Mum/03
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/06/2010
Related Assessment Year : 1998 - 99
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)

In order to attract provisions of section 41(1)(a), there must be a remission or cessation of the trading liability and consequently a benefit must enure to assessee

Case Name : SI Group India Ltd. Vs. ITAT (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 1511 & 1512
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/06/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Bombay High Court (1882)

Conditions prescribed in clauses (a),(b) and (c) of sub-section 7 of section 94 are intended to be cumulative in nature

Case Name : CIT Vs. Alka Bhosle (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 2656 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/06/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

In the absence of failure of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary during his assessment under sub-section (3) of section 143 no action can be taken after the expiry of four years

Case Name : Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. Vs. DCIT (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: Writ Petition No. 53 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/06/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Bombay High Court (1882)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

When Banks claim deduction of bad debt written off in previous year by virtue of proviso to section 36(1)(vii), they are entitled to claim deduction of such bad debt only to extent it exceeds provision created and allowed as deduction under clause (viia)

Case Name : CIT Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd. (Kerela High Court)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 299 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/12/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Kerala High Court (909)

Invoking provisions of section 80-IA(10) does not arise in case there are no transactions by assessee with any other person

Case Name : Reliance Energy Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA Nos. 4629, 4630, 4702 & 4703 /Mum/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/05/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2001- 02
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

INDO-UAE DTAA: Mere physical presence of non-resident’s vessel in territorial waters of India pursuant to hiring of vessel on Bareboat Charter terms by applicant does not, without anything more, constitute a permanent establishment

Case Name : In re. Seabird Exploration FZ (AAR Delhi)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: AAR No. 829 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/07/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3746)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Housing project for purpose of section 80-IB(10) does not include construction of commercial establishment carried out by another entity in that area

Case Name : ITO Vs. Khyati Financial Services (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 3740/Mum/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/06/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2005- 2006
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Indo-Mauritius DTAA – Applicant is not liable to be taxed in India on proposed transfer of its shares in an Indian Company to its wholly owned subsidiary company in India

Case Name : In Re. Praxair Pacific Ltd. (AAR Delhi)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: AAR/855/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/07/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3746)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031