Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22504 Results

Proceedings u/s 163 are only intended to ensure that a person can be regarded as a representative assessee only on existence of certain conditions

Case Name : Hindalco Industries Ltd. Vs. DCIT(IT) (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA Nos. 3667 and 4684/Mum/2005, 6923/Mum/2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/05/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2001- 2002
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Interest on Non Performing Assets which is doubtful of recovery, taxable on receipt basis

Case Name : CIT Vs. Vasisth Chay Vyapar Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : [ITA 552/2005]
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/11/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Capital gains arising from transfer of the Development right to attract the provisions Section 50C of the Act

Case Name : Arif Akhatar Hussain Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 541/Mum/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/12/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Continuing debit balance is not an “international transaction”

Case Name : Nimbus Communications Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 11 (1) (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 6597/Mum/09
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/01/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2004- 05
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

The assessee is not entitled to adjustment of 5 per cent as stipulated u/s 92C(2), where only one of the several methods specified u/s 92C(1) is applied by the assessee to determine the ALP

Case Name : M/s J.J.Spectrum Silk Ltd. Vs Dy Commissioner of IT, Cir.11 (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 625/Kol/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/11/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2005- 06
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Kolkata (1036)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Computation of gross profit margin should be based on audited accounts and should not be a notional figure.

Case Name : M/s. Monsanto Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income- tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 9130/MUM/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/05/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

TPO cannot reject TP method adopted by assessee on the ground that the comparables are wrongly chosen

Case Name : Star Diamond Group Vs. Dy. Director of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No: 3923/Mum/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/01/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2004- 2005
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

DRP must not have "perfunctory approach"- Delhi High Court

Case Name : Ericsson AB Vs Additional Director Of Income Tax Range 1 (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 689/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/01/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Exemption U/s. 10(23C)(vi) cannot be denied merely because there is a surplus

Case Name : St. Lawrence Educational Society (Regd.) & Another Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi (Central) & Another (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 1254/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/01/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Delhi HC rules block assessment order on protective basis Permissible even for block assessment u/s 158BC and 158BD

Case Name : Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Mahindra Fin-Lease P. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 981 Of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/01/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031