Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22499 Results

Reference to Special Bench cannot be withdrawn merely for the reason that HC has admitted identical question of law in another case

Case Name : DCIT Vs Summit Securities Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 4977/Mum/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/08/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 2007
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Supply of food and beverage, in sealed containers to international airlines leaving India, amounts to exports within the meaning of Sec 80HHC

Case Name : EIH Limited Vs CIT (Kolkata High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 328 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Calcutta High Court (844) Kolkata High Court (20)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Assessee liable to pay interest under s 234B and 234C on the tax payable on book profits computed under s 115J, notwithstanding the fact that it was a deemed profit

Case Name : Bee Pee Jay Finance Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Central- II & Anr. (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 289 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Calcutta High Court (844)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

When the disputed issue is decided by the Apex Court, the proceeding initiated u/s 263, against the deduction wrongly claimed by the assessee and allowed by the AO, cannot be said to be an invalid stating that there were two opinions available

Case Name : Jai Mica Supply Co Pvt Ltd Vs CIT (Kolkata High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 217 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Calcutta High Court (844) Kolkata High Court (20)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Assessee can claim lower of depreciation or business loss as claimed in the books of account for the preceding year while computing book profits u/s 115J

Case Name : Peico Electronics & Electrical Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Kolkata High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 353 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Calcutta High Court (844) Kolkata High Court (20)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Tribunal’s order not involving substantial question of law cannot be appealed in high court

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Guntur Vs Crane Betel Nut Powder Works (Andhra Pradesh High Court)
Appeal Number : CEA NO. 129 OF 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Andhra Pradesh HC (221)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Whether while computing the disallowance u/s 37(3), each trip of the employee will be considered separately and no set off will be allowed for the amount of deficit in the next trip by the same employee in the same year ?

Case Name : CIT Vs M/s SRF Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ITR 164/1995
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Even if assessee admits different sums of undisclosed income on two different days, and then retracts one of its statements, no addition can be sustained for having recorded wrong disclosure statements during the search

Case Name : M/s. M. Narayanan & Bros. Vs Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case (Appeal) No. 81 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Madras High Court (1763)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Whether the notional interest on interest-free deposit from tenants is to be considered while determining the correct ALV u/s 23(1)(a)?

Case Name : DCIT, Mumbai Vs M/s Sumer Ville Investments (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 367 & 2657/Mum/07
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/06/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2003- 04
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Penalty attracted on Bank Interest not disclosed in Return despite non claim of TDS

Case Name : Sanjay S. Shah Vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahemdabad)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 432/ Ahd/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/06/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Ahmedabad (1127)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031