Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Filter Judiciary

Found 22499 Results

Section 54F Exemption available even if investment is made under joint name with spouse

Case Name : Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Ravinder Kumar Arora (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1106 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/09/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Sale of Software without granting right to duplicate, amounts to sale of copyrighted article and not the transfer of copyright and therefore not taxable as ‘Royalty’

Case Name : M/s. Novel Inc. Vs. The Deputy Director of Income- Tax (International Taxation) (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 4368/Mum/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/11/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2007-2008
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No functions, assets and risks analysis is required before AY 2002-03 for determination of profits attributable to dependent agent permanent establishment; no further attribution if dependent agent paid arm’s length commission

Case Name : Director of Income Tax Vs BBC Worldwide Ltd. (High Court of New Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 703 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/11/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

TPO cannot take cognisance suo moto of any international transaction for adjustment in ALP

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 938/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/11/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Payments received by a non-resident for Value Added Services (VAS) is partly treated as ‘Royalty’ and partly as ‘Fees for Technical Services’ under India-UK tax treaty

Case Name : De Beers UK Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Intl. Taxation) (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 8831/Mum/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/11/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2007- 08
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Taxes paid by the employer is treated as perquisites included in the salary and cannot be consider monetary payment to employee

Case Name : Assistant Director of Income-tax V/s. M/s. Sun downer Offshore International Burmuda Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 4444 & 4445/D/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/12/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Delhi (3706)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Interest for shortfall in payment of advance tax leviable while computing book profit under MAT provisions

Case Name : D.C.I.T.,Circle 2(1), New Delhi V/s Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2825/Del/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/12/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Delhi (3706)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

S. 263 – AO’s acceptance of Jurisdictional HC Law may be ‘erroneous & prejudicial

Case Name : Star India Limited Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 7476/Mum/07
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/11/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2003- 04
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Mumbai (3584)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Penalty u/s 271C not leviable when assessee misconstrued provisions

Case Name : Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rajai Nagar Co- Operative Bank Ltd. (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 86 of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13956) Karnataka High Court (635)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Expenses incurred by manufacturer and seller of pre-recorded audio cassettes and CDs on acquisition of intangible asset is to be treated as revenue expenditure

Case Name : DCIT Vs. M/s. Aditya Music (I) Ltd. (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 720/Hyd/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/12/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Courts : All ITAT (14953) ITAT Hyderabad (630)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031