Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 2226 Results

Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules not applicable to credit availed on input services

Case Name : Seven Star Steels Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/868/Kol./2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/12/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Kolkata (370)

Appeal can be dismissed for non-compliance with provisions of sec. 35F of Excise Act, 1962

Case Name : Gupta Builders Vs C.C.E. (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 55378 Of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Site formation service taxable as mining services from 1-6-2007

Case Name : Rungta Projects Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Stay Order No. ST/S/858/2012-CUS (PB)
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

When assessee claimed set-off of excess payment against short-payment, matter was remanded back for decision after ascertaining excess deposit

Case Name : New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi-I (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 55478 & 55479 OF 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Penalty U/s. 78 to be waived if Service Tax and interest been paid before issue of SCN

Case Name : G. Kannan Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Service Tax), Madurai (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/454 TO 456 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Chennai (646)

Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 not applies if no cenvated input used in manufacture of exempted goods

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry, Commissionerate Vs EID Parry (I) Ltd. (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : C.M.A. NOS. 2071 OF 2005, 1352 OF 2008,
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/03/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Madras High Court (1758)

If assessee failed to comply with stay order, appeal liable to be dismissed for such non-compliance

Case Name : Gurjar Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 55520 OF 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/02/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Abatement available on GTA service even if consignment note not mentions about non-availment of credit

Case Name : Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Bolpur (CESTAT Kolkatta)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A/636/KOL./2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Kolkata (370)

Education Cess can be paid out of Cenvat credit of basic excise duty

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Vapi Vs Madura Industries Textiles (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Appeal No. 2210 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Gujarat High Court (1139)

Management / repair of railway sidings owned by private parties is prima-facie an incident of the maintenance and repair of railway tracks

Case Name : Central Railway Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Nagpur (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Central Excise Appeal (L) No. 35 OF 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/02/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Bombay High Court (1879)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031