Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 1686 Results

Rule 6 not applies to waste like bagasse, press mud, etc. which are not a manufactured product

Case Name : Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd. Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 11791 (M/B) OF 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/05/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13924) Allahabad High Court (800)

An issue not raised & decided by Commissioner (Appeals) cannot be entertained in 2nd appeal before Tribunal

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Mahasha Enterprises (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/637/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3903) CESTAT Delhi (905)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

CESTAT order not in compliance with HC directions can be restored to CESTAT

Case Name : Synefra Engineering & Construction Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : CEA (L) NO. 36 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13924) Bombay High Court (1879)

Knowledge of assessee’s son is knowledge of assessee himself, No Condonation on the ground of Ignorance

Case Name : Mr. Siddramappa S. Yelamali Vs The Commissioner of Central Excise (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : Cea No. 25 Of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13924) Karnataka High Court (633)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Cenvat credit is admissible on the basis of invoices issued by consignment agent

Case Name : Mittal Pigments (P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 1401 OF 2012-SM (BR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3903) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Cenvat credit admissible on Dismantling service of existing structure for renovation

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Jindal Pipes Ltd. (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 1491 OF 2012 - SM (BR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3903) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Department appeal not valid if review committee not records its satisfaction for filing of appeal

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I Vs Kundalia Industries (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : C.E.A.C. NO. 2 OF 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/03/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13924) Delhi High Court (3367)

SCN issued after death of proprietor is bad in law

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh Vs Shree Ambica Steel Industries (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A/1168/2012-EX (BR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3903) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Service tax not payable on Technical inspection & testing of LPF Tankers under Indian Explosives Act, 1884

Case Name : Pressure Vessels & Equipments Testing Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 895 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3903) CESTAT Chennai (646)

Only standard text books sold eligible were for ST exemption, not study materials provided as a part of service

Case Name : Soni Classes Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-I (CESTAT DElhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. ST/A/597/2012-Cus
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3903) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031