Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Schrader Duncan Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Schrader Duncan Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) The core issue was whether the packing and labeling of ‘O’ rings constituted a manufacturing activity that would attract excise duty. The tribunal ruled that it did not, aligning with the original authority’s view that the ‘O’ rings are classified under Chapter 4016 and that no excise duty was payable. The tribunal’s decision was based on the following grounds: The tribunal agreed with the original authority’s classification of the product ‘O’ rings under Chapter 4016...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930