Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Schrader Duncan Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Schrader Duncan Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)

The core issue was whether the packing and labeling of ‘O’ rings constituted a manufacturing activity that would attract excise duty. The tribunal ruled that it did not, aligning with the original authority’s view that the ‘O’ rings are classified under Chapter 4016 and that no excise duty was payable. The tribunal’s decision was based on the following grounds: The tribunal agreed with the original authority’s classification of the product ‘O’ rings under

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031