Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Y & Associates Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 99 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/06/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Y & Associates Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)

It is apparent from the schema of ‘deemed’ manufacture that emergence of goods of another description from any process to which the enumerated goods are subjected to would take it outside the scope of ‘deemed’ and requiring conformity with the general comprehension of ‘manufacture’ or be ‘incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product’ in section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. It is not the case of Revenue that the im

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31