Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Chandrakala Associates (CAAR Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : CAAR
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
In re Chandrakala Associates (CAAR Mumbai) The subject goods for which advance ruling has been sought, their characteristics, manufacturing process, utility etc. are already mentioned in the aforementioned paras. The subject goods are clear float glass, with an absorbent layer, which is fluorescent under UV illumination. The subject goods are not wired, not tinted and not green in colour. The heading 7005 10 covers non-wired glass having an absorbent, reflecting or non-reflecting layer and the headings 7005 21 to 7005 29 deal with non-wired glasses which are body tinted, opacified, flashed et...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930