Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Chandrakala Associates (CAAR Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : CAAR
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Chandrakala Associates (CAAR Mumbai)

The subject goods for which advance ruling has been sought, their characteristics, manufacturing process, utility etc. are already mentioned in the aforementioned paras. The subject goods are clear float glass, with an absorbent layer, which is fluorescent under UV illumination. The subject goods are not wired, not tinted and not green in colour. The heading 7005 10 covers non-wired glass having an absorbent, reflecting or non-reflecting layer and the headings 7005 21 to 7005 29 deal with non

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31