Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of Customs Vs Punjab Exports (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Commissioner of Customs Vs Punjab Exports (CESTAT Chandigarh)
CESTAT find that the learned adjudicating authority has clearly held that M/s Kansal Texo Tubes (P) Ltd was not a 100% EOU on the basis of the invoices issued under Rule 52(A) and 173(G); we find that learned adjudicating authority has totally ignored the assertion in the show cause notice that M/s Kansal Texo Tubes (P) Ltd was a 100% EOU; learned adjudicating authority has not carried out or got conducted any enquiry to come up such a conclusion. We find that the show cause notice as well as the submissions of the learned Authorise...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
