Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs Vs Punjab Exports (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commissioner of Customs Vs Punjab Exports (CESTAT Chandigarh) CESTAT find that the learned adjudicating authority has clearly held that M/s Kansal Texo Tubes (P) Ltd was not a 100% EOU on the basis of the invoices issued under Rule 52(A) and 173(G); we find that learned adjudicating authority has totally ignored the assertion in the show cause notice that M/s Kansal Texo Tubes (P) Ltd was a 100% EOU; learned adjudicating authority has not carried out or got conducted any enquiry to come up such a conclusion. We find that the show cause notice as well as the submissions of the learned Authorise...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930