Case Law Details
Case Name : Amglo Resources Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Custom (NS-III) (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amglo Resources Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Custom (NS-III) (CESTAT Mumbai)
Held that para 2 of Circular 35/2017-Cus is clearly contrary to Section 110 A and is, consequently, void and unenforceable at law. It is not permissible for the CBEC, by executive fiat, to incorporate limitations, on provisional release of seized goods, which find no place in the parent statutory provision, i.e. Section 110 A of the Act.
Facts-
The appellant, Amglo Resources Pvt Ltd, entered into negotiations with M/s NBJ International FZ-LLC, Dubai for the supply of ‘copper cathode’ conforming to LME Grade “A”...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

