This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Adjudicating authority can exercise discretion for provisional release of seized goods
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Amglo Resources Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Custom (NS-III) (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Amglo Resources Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Custom (NS-III) (CESTAT Mumbai)
Held that para 2 of Circular 35/2017-Cus is clearly contrary to Section 110 A and is, consequently, void and unenforceable at law. It is not permissible for the CBEC, by executive fiat, to incorporate limitations, on provisional release of seized goods, which find no place in the parent statutory provision, i.e. Section 110 A of the Act.
Facts-
The appellant, Amglo Resources Pvt Ltd, entered into negotiations with M/s NBJ International FZ-LLC, Dubai for the supply of ‘copper cathode’ conforming to LME Grade “A”...





