IT: Where Ruler continues to occupy palace, whether by actually utilizing it or by keeping it vacant, it shall be, for purpose of section 10(19A), deemed to be in his occupation, and he will also be entitled to exemption under section 10(19A) in respect of annual value of Part of palace, possession of which he has parted with in favour of tenants.
Section 158BC(c): Where any search has been conducted under section 132 or books of account, other documents or assets are requisitioned under section 132A, in the case of any person
A declaration in the return filed by Assessee under Wealth Tax Act would certainly be a relevant fact for determination of cost of acquisition which under Section 55(2) of Act to be determined by a determination of fair market value.
SC held that Rental Income from business of leasing out house properties taxable as business income and not income from House property
Long pending dispute regarding constitutional validity of entry tax levied by various States has been settled by Hon ‘bless Supreme Court by its judgement delivered on 11.11.2016
Supreme Court upheld constitutional validity of Entry tax imposed by States. A nine-judge Constitution Bench, overrules ‘compensatory tax’ theory propounded by 7 judges bench
Section 54E of Income Tax Act,1961 does Not Make Any Distinction Between Depreciable Asset And Non-Depreciable Asset And, Therefore, The Exemption Available to the Depreciable Asset Under Section 54E Cannot Be Denied By Referring to the Fiction Created Under Section 50
Nominee of Deceased Member is absolutely entitled for the Ownership by transfer, Co-op. Soc can’t challenge the right of Nominee a settled Law of the land. No legal heirship, court order or succession certificate is required.
In the case of Mega Cabs Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union Of India & Ors. dated 03.06.2016 , Honorable Delhi High Court has Declared Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, as amended, to the extent that it authorises the officers of the Service Tax Department, the audit party deputed by a Commissioner or the CAG […]
The High Court has dismissed the Writ Petition by the impugned judgment and order dated 2.9.2011. Being dissatisfied with the dismissal of his writ petition the appellant preferred a Review Petition which was also dismissed by the High Court by the impugned judgment and order dated 24.11.2011.
