The issue under consideration is whether the best judgement assessment can be set aside by filing revised return beyond specified time period?
CIAL Duty Free And Retail Services Ltd (CDRSL) Vs. Union of India (Kerala High Court) Kerala High Court held that petitioner shall pay the GST on input services including Concession Fee and claim ITC of the entire tax amount and thereafter claim refund of the same by following the procedure prescribed under Section 54(3) of […]
Hon’ble Kerala High Court has held that bank guarantee shall not be encashed till such time where assessee preferred appeal against the detention order before the Appellate authority.
It is the case of the petitioner that the transportation was of a consignment of watches that had been supplied to him by the seller in Delhi at a discounted rate of Rs.8.99. It is seen that the transportation of the goods was accompanied by Ext.P4 tax invoice, where the supplier in Delhi had shown the actual price of the consignment of watches, which was Rs.4,49,550/- and had given a discount of almost the entire amount save to the extent of Rs.8.99, and had paid IGST at the rate of 18% on the actual value of the watches.
Sulochana Gupta Vs RBG Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (Kerala High Court) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, can be for the enforcement of fundamental rights or for any other purpose, as envisaged under Article 226 of the Constitution. There is no pleadings or materials to substantiate that the appellants are discharging […]
The issue under consideration is whether revised amount can be taken as the quantified amount to test the eligibility for Sabka Vikas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDR)?
Rajive And Company Vs. Assistant Commissioner Special Circle (Kerala High Court) Petitioners will no doubt be entitled to seek copies of the documents seized from their premises, if and when they are confronted by the respondents with any notice or other proceeding, wherein reliance is placed on the said seized documents. I, therefore, make it […]
The issue under consideration is whether detention of goods merely because the consignee is mentioned as an unregistered person in the e-way bill is justified in law?
High Court gave direction to the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for carry forward of accumulated credit through the Form GST- Tran 1 afresh in the light of Standard Operating Procedure
The issue under consideration is whether the serving of assessment order by uploading it on web portal and not communicated separately to the assessee will be considered as valid under law?
