They argued that, based on this ruling, despite the investigation, search, and seizure being conducted by an improper officer, the evidence could still be used, and the show cause notice issued by a proper officer should not be set aside.
Karnataka HC rules on individual workman’s dispute for regularization under Industrial Disputes Act. Tata Advanced System Ltd. challenges order of reference.
Karnataka High Court quashes criminal proceedings against trustees for alleged provident fund violations, clarifying IPC provisions on employer liabilities.
Devanur Thimmasetty Srinivasa Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Assessment order taking entirety of the sale consideration without taking note of the indexed cost of acquisition. is liable to set-aside- Karnataka HC In a recent ruling, the Karnataka High Court quashed an income tax reassessment order and notice issued to the petitioner where the full sale […]
In a recent ruling, the Karnataka HC held that Notice and endorsement issued without waiting for expiry of the appeal period of three months is illegal and arbitrary and liable to be quashed.
Karnataka High Court held that demand of Goods and Services Tax (GST) under reverse charge mechanism from service receiver will lead to double taxation since entire tax already paid by service provider. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
Karnataka High Court addresses ITC blocking under Rule 86A of CGST Rules, directing authorities to provide post-decisional hearing and follow due process.
Respondent was appointed in the kitchen of the petitioner, on acts of theft, misappropriation and fraud, articles of charges were issued. Notably, it is alleged that a Safal brand one litre oil sachet was found hidden on the tank bag of his two wheeler.
It is submitted that the specific request of the petitioner for furnishing the entirety of the statements made as also the seized material, has not been accepted in its entirety and only the portions of statements were made available which has prejudiced the petitioner.
Karnataka High Court remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer since non-response to notice issued under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act by the petitioner was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause.
