Karnataka High Court held that forcible recovery during course of search or investigation is contrary to law and hence liable to be refunded back. Thus, writ appeal dismissed as devoid of merit.
Karnataka High Court sets aside GST order against Balaji Packaging, allowing reconsideration under Section 73 to avail Amnesty Scheme benefits.
Karnataka HC rules single tax ‘satisfaction note’ invalid for multiple years. Separate notes required under Section 153C, impacting tax assessments.
Karnataka High Court held that blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger by invoking Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 [CGST Rules] without granting pre-decisional hearing and without stating cogent reason in order is impermissible in law.
Karnataka High Court held that during re-assessment proceedings, claim for Input Tax Credit can be rectified under section 39 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, even when the same is disadvantageous to the State Exchequer.
Karnataka HC sets aside orders against MMIL over delayed ITC claim, remands case for reconsideration under amended Finance Act, 2024 provisions.
Petitioner in response had made a representation informing the respondent-BDA that, what was offered to him was a full completed apartment and there was no pre-construction agreement between the petitioner and respondent-BDA.
Karnataka High Court dismisses writ petition challenging a tax liability order under Section 179 of the IT Act, citing an alternative remedy under Section 264.
Held that wherever a company is required to deduct tax at source and to pay it to the account of the Central Government, failure on the part of the company in deducting or in paying such amount is an offence under the Act and has been made punishable.
On appeal. It was held that application for refund was rightly rejected, as it was filed beyond the prescribed limitation period of six years from the end of the assessment year for which the application/claim was made.
