Jharkhand High Court upholds Anosh Ekka’s conviction for acquiring disproportionate assets. Co-accused sentenced for abetting and conspiracy under P.C. Act.
Jharkhand High Court upholds conviction and sentencing of Anosh Ekka in a case involving disproportionate assets and money laundering under PMLA.
HC held that DRC-07 has been issued within five days of issuance of DRC-01 is a clear picture of violation of principles of natural justice.
Jharkhand High Court held that unadjusted TDS amount under Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act is allowed to be migrated under Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
HC quashed and set aside the orders blocking Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) of assessee without providing an opportunity of personal hearing.
Jharkhand High Court held that benefit under SVLDRS scheme cannot be denied by the designated committee on the reason that department has decided to file an appeal against the OIO.
Global Construction (A Proprietorship Firm) Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court) The appeal has been rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Goods & Services Tax and Central Excise, Ranchi only on the point of limitation since it was preferred after almost 2 years and 9 months on 29.09.2021. Under Section 85 of the Finance […]
Directorate General of GST Intelligence Vs Nikit Mittal (Jharkhand High Court) This Court has perused the order passed in W.P.(Cr.) No. 415 of 2018 and other analogous cases and Cont. Case (Cvl) No. 665 of 2019 and other analogous cases as also the order passed by the writ Court in W.P.(Cr.) No. 14 of 2019 […]
HC issues notice on the challenge to the vires of Rule 118 being contrary to section 142(11)(c) of the CGST Act. The petitioner contends no such condition in the statute. The transitional provision is for smooth transition into the new taxation regime and intends to avoid double taxation.
Jharkhand High Court held that impugned order passed, confirming penalty for expiry of e-way bill, without proper application of mind and without dealing with the contention raised by the petitioner is against the violation of principles of natural justice and hence bad in law.
