Basic fact that assessee is not eligible for filing return of income was not taken into account and therefore, there was no application of mind while recording reasons for reopening.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not leviable as assessee claimed the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, with respect to the interest income under a bonafide belief.
Once the assessment order passed itself is null and void, the same cannot be the subject matter revision under section 263 of the Act
ITAT held that both AO & CIT(A) passed orders in a very casual manner and in complete disregard to the principles of natural justice.
Assessee should be allowed benefit of deduction under section 54B of Act since purchase in new property has been made out of advances received towards sale of agricultural properties held by assessee.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that invocation of proceedings u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as AO has not put on record that material seized during the course of third party search belongs to the assessee.
Legal battle: Anilkumar Kantilal Trivedi challenges ITO’s Section 50C addition on agricultural land sale. Appeal details and key arguments analyzed.
w.e.f. 1.4.1999 computer software been included with computers for rate of depreciation in Rules, entitling assessee to 60% depreciation rate
ITAT Ahmedabad held that payment of interest towards compromise agreement was not made towards any infraction of law and therefore, the same is allowable under section 37 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that disallowance of sales commission expenses justified as there was no basis and reason for paying the commission to these agents who even otherwise were closely related to the assesse.
