Explore the case of Western Geco International Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Delhi) and decision regarding exclusion of reimbursement of service tax from gross turnover for computation of taxable income under Section 44BB of Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that Common Area Maintenance charges (CAM Charges) paid by the assessee are liable for 2% TDS u/s 194C of the Income Tax Act and not at 10% u/s 194I of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that the receipts from centralised service income are not taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS)/ Fees for included Services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(a) of India-USA DTAA.
ITAT Delhi held that issuance of notice by AO in the status of ‘Local Authority’ and assessment framed in different status i.e. in the name of ‘Artificial Juridical Person’ is bad in law and hence liable to be cancelled.
A comprehensive review of the landmark decision by ITAT Delhi in the SFS Infinite Ltd Vs DCIT case, examining the quashing of reassessment based on insufficient and obscure information.
ITAT Delhi held that difference between service tax return and the revenue was occurred due to the wrong exchange rate applied to export income transaction while filing the service tax return. Hence, mere mistake in the service tax return does not mean that the income of the assessee has been suppressed.
A detailed review of ITAT Delhi’s decision in the Dr. Shyam Sunder Doda Vs ACIT case, underscoring the importance of confronting evidence to the assessee before making any tax additions.
Comprehensive analysis of the ITAT Delhi’s decision in Gulab Impex Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, affirming that mere acceptance of disallowance does not necessarily constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.
ITAT Delhi upholds the deduction of foreign travel expenses of directors in the Arms Communications Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT case, emphasizing the role of these expenses in business growth and prospecting.
ITAT Delhi held that direction by CIT(A) to AO to take appropriate action for not deducting TDS from the perquisite in respect of interest free loans given to directors and to take appropriate action to tax the perquisites u/s. 17 of the Act is in excess of jurisdiction conferred by section 251 hence deleted.
