Celestial Aviation Trading 64 Limited Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) Facts- The petitioner entered into an Aircraft Specified Lease Agreement with Air India Limited for lease of one aircraft for a period of 12 years. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner made applications under Section 197 of the Act for ‘Nil‟ rate […]
PCIT Vs Shailja Pasricha (Delhi High Court) Assessing Officer had in fact invoked Section 50C of the Act claiming that the sale consideration of Rs. 18 Crores received by the respondent was below the Circle Rate. This was clearly ignoring the fact that the sale consideration was in fact Rs. 35 Crores. The CIT(A) and […]
HDFC Bank Limited Vs Commissioner DVAT of Trade And Taxes & Anr (Delhi High Court) Conclusion: Form ‘F’ was not issued in respect of inter-state stock transfers by assessee-bank due to default in paying Central Sales Tax and the order of Supreme Court restraining the respondents from taking any kind of coercive action against assessee […]
Delhi High Court ruling on advocates as power of attorney holders. Amarjeet Singh Sahni’s dual role clarified. Settlement reached in property dispute. Details of MoU considered.
Praveen Kumar Gupta Vs. Ravi Chadha and Ors. (Delhi High Court) Stay under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is available against infringement of registered trade mark and not against passing off In the matter of Praveen Kumar Gupta Vs. Ravi Chadha and Ors. [CM (M) 428/2021, CMAPPL. 20526/2021] dated 06th August 2021, […]
DRS Logistics (P) Ltd. Vs Drs Logistics (P) Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Facts- An application seeking ad interim ex parte injunction was filed by the plaintiffs against Google India, Google LLC and Just Dial restraining them from using or permitting third parties to use plaintiffs’ registered trademark AGARWAL PACKERS & MOVERS or DRS LOGISTICS either […]
Since none of the other relevant material, which was the basis of the seizure under Section 17(1A) and the complaint under Section 17(4) of the PMLA were supplied to assessee, as the same were not even supplied by the ED to the AA. Thus, ED should forward a copy of the documents to the Adjudicating Authority immediately after a freezing order under PML Rule.
Umkal Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre & Anr. (Delhi High Court) Since in the present case no hearing had been granted before passing the impugned assessment order, there is a violation of principles of natural justice as well as mandatory procedure prescribed in ‘Faceless Assessment Scheme’ and stipulated in Section 144B of […]
Grant of bail was refused as applicant did not return the amounts due to the complainants and there was a breach of trust and faith and was against the national economy and national interest, whereby a large number of innocent investors had been duped of their hard-earned money.
Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Limited Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) It is our view that, the power available to the Tribunal under subsection (2) of Section 254 of the Act is not limited to a mistake committed by the Tribunal. The amendment to the order of the Tribunal can also be made, if it is […]
