Chhattisgarh High Court sets aside PMLA cognizance order against Arun Pati Tripathi, citing denial of hearing opportunity before cognizance.
Chhattisgarh High Court disposes of DCIT vs. Sanjay Agrawal income tax appeal as tax effect falls below revised ₹2 crore limit per CBDT’s latest circular.
Chhattisgarh High Court voids Section 263 revision order against Shilphy Steels, ruling it invalid due to lack of reasonable hearing opportunity for the assessee.
Chhattisgarh High Court dismisses Anand Sales Enterprises’ writ petition against a GST demand, citing availability of statutory appeal under Section 107.
Chhattisgarh High Court rejects BPS Infrastructure’s review petition, affirming limited scope of review jurisdiction; original appeal dismissal upheld.
Raj Kumar Bothra Vs DCIT (Chhattisgarh High Court) AO should not have resorted to section 143(1) (a) and instead could have resorted to section 143 (3): Chhathisgarh HC The Chhattisgarh High Court, in the case of Raj Kumar Bothra vs. DCIT, has ruled that an Assessing Officer (AO) should not have resorted to Section 143(1)(a) […]
AO held that assessee had made repayment of the loan to M/s. Tata Finance Corporation in that financial year to the extent of Rs. 6,71,939 in cash against the loan taken for commercial vehicle.
Trust has adopted the mercantile system of accounting for the AY 2011-12 for which depreciation of ₹ 8.55 lakhs is to be accepted which the authorities have not accepted, same ought to have been allowed as depreciation being notional expenditure.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that imposing liability u/s. 201(1) of the Income Tax Act for failure to deduct TDS without providing opportunity of being heard is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, matter remitted back for fresh consideration.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that reasonable cause has been shown for non-compliance with the provisions contained in Section 269T of the Act and further it is not disputed that the transaction is genuine and bona fide.
