Sponsored
    Follow Us:

CESTAT Delhi

CESTAT allows 12% Interest on refund of deposit paid under Section 35F

March 21, 2022 3777 Views 0 comment Print

Elegant Developers Vs The Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST (CESTAT Delhi) It is observed that original Adjudicating Authority has awarded interest at the rate of five per cent. The said rate is the lowest rate in the amended Section 35FF. The amount in question is not an amount of duty but was an amount paid […]

Cenvat refund of unutilised credit is permissible when it is not possible to utilise such credit

March 20, 2022 1554 Views 0 comment Print

Scot Innovations Wires & Cables Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Central Goods, Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in UoI vs. Slovak India Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. 2006 (201) ELT 559 (Kar.) =2008 (10) STR 101 (Kar.) has held that in the absence of any express prohibitory provisions, unutilised credit […]

One year section 11B limitation on refund claim not applicable due to overriding effect of CGST Act

March 17, 2022 3300 Views 0 comment Print

Jai Mateshwaari Steels Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner, CGST- Dehradun (CESTAT Delhi) Section 142(3) of CGST Act, provides that after the appointed day (30th June 2017) every claim for refund of any duty, tax, interest, etc., under the existing law shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the existing law and any amount […]

Extended Limitation cannot be invoked in absence of Fraud by Taxpayer

March 17, 2022 783 Views 0 comment Print

Benefit of extended period of limitation is not available to Revenue in the present matters, there being no element of fraud, mis-statement or contumacious conduct on the part of the appellant.

Prasar Bharati Cannot Retain Service Tax Collected From Customers when no tax was actually chargeable

March 14, 2022 1773 Views 0 comment Print

Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Vs Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi (CESTAT Delhi) In the present case, it is true that no service tax was chargeable on the activity of the appellant, viz., carrying the advertisements in its broadcast and telecast. Therefore, the Government cannot collect service tax. It is also true that Section […]

No penalty for import of drugs and cosmetics if competent authority issued NOC for release goods after inspection

March 14, 2022 1965 Views 0 comment Print

Beverly Hills Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) After considering written submission of the appellant, the Adjudicating Authority vide impugned order has held that the appellant had attempted to clear goods imported vide Bill of Entry No. 6374054 dt. 14.05.2018 through non-notified ICD/ Port in violations of the provisions contained in Rule […]

Central Excise Act, 1944- Purchase & Sale includes transfer between two sister units

March 12, 2022 2454 Views 0 comment Print

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & GST (CESTAT Delhi) Learned Counsel for the appellant has mentioned that they had purchased a generator set in the year 2004 which was used by them at their Jaipur plant. After 12 years of its use, since the Jaipur plant got closed that the said […]

Section 65(105)(zzza): Works contract service not include Electric winding of motor

March 11, 2022 1695 Views 0 comment Print

Sahni Electric Works Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) Undisputedly Electric motor winding job required both winding of the motors and also using the materials required for such service. Thus, it was a composite works contract which involved both rendering service and supplying material. The Revenue also does not dispute that it is a […]

CESTAT upheld validity of Issue of two SCNs for the same Period

March 6, 2022 9876 Views 0 comment Print

Varun Beverages Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) The preliminary objection by the appellant is that a show cause notice (SCN) dated 10 February 2016 was issued by the Department demanding duty short paid by irregularly availing exemption under Notification No. 1/2011-CE along with interest and penalty. The present show […]

CESTAT explains related person & inter-connected undertakings for Central Excise Valuation rules

March 6, 2022 2991 Views 0 comment Print

Khyati Ispat Private Limited Vs Principal Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi) The facts of the case, in brief, are that M/s Khyati Ispat Pvt. Ltd., Raipur3, is a private limited company engaged in manufacture of Iron and Steel products, such as, angles, channels & joists falling under Chapter 72 of Schedule II to the Central Excise Tariff […]

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031