A landmark judgement from CESTAT clarifies that brand promotion carried out by IPL player Pinal Rohit Shah for Mumbai Indians does not fall under the category of Business Auxiliary Service. Understand the case details, analysis and implications here.
A critical judgement by CESTAT remands the case of Suraj Ropes, a defunct manufacturer, seeking a refund of unutilised CENVAT credit accumulated due to export under bond and LUT. Read on for a comprehensive analysis of the case.
Insightful overview of the CESTAT Ahmedabad’s decision in Deepali Suresh Padhiar Vs C.C.-Ahmedabad case, examining the implications for non-resident Indians unaware of Indian Baggage Rules.
In a landmark decision, CESTAT Ahmedabad supports Welspun Corp Ltd, permitting the use of Cenvat credit of basic excise duty to offset Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess, establishing a crucial legal precedent.
Learn about the significant verdict of CESTAT Ahmedabad in Universal Medicap Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST case, offering critical insights on taxability and exemptions concerning the sterilization process in goods production.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that as ‘information technology software service’ was implemented w.e.f. 16.05.2008 the same cannot be held taxable prior to that date. Hence, demand for the period prior to 16.05.2008 is not maintainable.
CESTAT, remanded order passed by Adjudicating Authority and held that denial of cross-examination of witnesses is violative of principles of natural justice.
In a landmark ruling, CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled that the Cenvat credit is applicable on cement and steel used in Commercial and Industrial Construction Services, marking a key interpretation of Cenvat credit rules.
Explore the decisive ruling by the CESTAT Ahmedabad in the Thakarshi J Likhiya Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST case, focusing on the invocation of the extended period of limitation in service tax demand.
CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of Sun Pharmaceuticals, determining that the valuation of physician samples is governed by Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Discover the details and implications of this landmark case.
