CESTAT Ahmedabad held that services availed in respect of effluent treatment plant for treatment of industrial waste is in relation to the overall manufacturing activity and hence CENVAT Credit is duly admissible.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Ahmedabad order in the case of Rajkot District Co Operative Bank Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST. The issue revolved around the liability to pay service tax on the commission received by the appellant from the Agriculture Insurance Company of India Limited. The order analyzes the applicability of an exemption notification and concludes that the appellant is eligible for the exemption, therefore not liable to pay service tax on the commission received.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that building constructed by the Appellant is not commercial and industrial construction, therefore does not fall under the category of taxable services, as the same is not used for commercial and industry but it is used for providing education.
A thorough review of the CESTAT Ahmedabad case between Kandla Port Trust and C.C.E. & Kutch (Gandhidham) where the CESTAT quashed the order as the SCN was time-barred.
In the case between Shital Ispat Pvt Ltd and C.C.-Jamnagar, CESTAT Ahmedabad orders re-consideration, stating the one-year period for filing a refund begins from the date of finalizing the bill of entry in instances of initial provisional assessment.
Explore the crucial CESTAT Ahmedabad judgment on Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T, casting a spotlight on the adherence to EXIM policy and implications for the pharmaceutical industry.
The case of Hindalco Industries Limited Vs C.C.E-Bharuch, involving a forged VKGUY/DEPB licence issue, has been remanded for reconsideration by the CESTAT Ahmedabad. Read for in-depth analysis and conclusions on this case.
The CESTAT Ahmedabad upholds Commissioner (Appeals)’ decision to remand the C.C.E. & S.T Vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd case back to adjudicating authority for re-examination of documentary evidence regarding unjust enrichment.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules that to avail abatement under Notification No. 01/2006-ST, the cost of material provided by the service recipient must be included in the gross value of construction service.
CESTAT Ahmedabad holds that no separate service tax can be levied on the commission received by the appellant from BSNL, when it’s included in the gross sale price of SIM cards. This verdict aligns with previous judgments favoring the assessee.
