CESTAT Ahmedabad’s ruling on excise duty for physician samples sold to dealers for free distribution to doctors. Analysis of Sun Pharmaceuticals vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-ii case.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that the subsequent service of the order copy to the appellant is the date of communication of the order-in-original to the appellant.
CESTAT Ahmedabad sets aside service tax demand on electrification services, ruling they do not qualify as works contract services. Read detailed case analysis.
In Lyka Labs Ltd. vs. C.C.E. & S.T., CESTAT Ahmedabad addresses the classification of Ayurvedic medicaments with non-active ingredients, setting legal precedence.
CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Sonic Chain Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Rajkot clarifies no penalty under Central Excise Rule 26 if no malafide intention. Analysis.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that as appellant has not exited from Special Economic Zone (SEZ), they are not eligible for clearing capital goods under the prevalent Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG Scheme).
Analysis of CESTAT Ahmedabad’s order on the exemption claim for Rent-a-Cab services provided in SEZ, emphasizing the need for supporting invoices.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that actual oil quantity physically received into the shore tank should be taken as the basis for payment of duty at the time of ex-bond bills of entry.
CESTAT Ahmedabad’s decision on penalty under Customs Act for fabricated DEPB scrips. Analysis of the case, rulings, and implications.
Analysis of CESTAT Ahmedabad’s ruling on eligibility to use Cenvat credit for service tax payment when engaged in both manufacturing and services. Case details and conclusion.
