CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Shakti Enterprise vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST clarifies that CHA’s reimbursable expenses are not subject to service tax. Explore the judgment’s impact.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of General Motors, allowing CENVAT credit on various services. The decision clarifies eligibility under CENVAT Credit Rules.
Explore the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on ‘Boron Ore’ customs duty exemption under Customs Notification No. 15/2017-CUS. Analysis of the case, legal arguments, and the decision to remand to the Adjudicating Authority for reevaluation. Stay informed on the latest developments in customs regulations.
CENVAT credit denied: CESTAT directed re-adjudication based on ISD invoices mentioning Mumbai address & not related to manufacturing activities.
CESTAT Ahmedabad orders re-adjudication of a 6.7 Cr excise duty demand on Haryana Steet Glass Limited for sheet glass clearance to DTA due to lack of document analysis.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of Crest Speciality Resins Pvt Ltd, stating no service tax on fees and royalty for unregistered Intellectual Property Rights owned by a foreign company
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules against the demand of Cenvat credit on capital goods, citing the absence of suppression of facts. Full analysis and implications in this legal case.
Mere lack of supplier response won’t invalidate appellant’s Kraft Paper production. Find out more about this CESTAT Ahmedabad order in this blog post!
Explore case of Paras Founders & Engineers vs. C.C.E. – a dispute regarding excise duty & SSI exemption oversight. Read the analysis, background, legal precedents & CESTAT’s decision.
Sanghi Industries Ltd Vs C.C. (CESTAT Ahmedabad): Demurrage charges not includable in custom valuation of imported goods for purpose of charging custom duty.
