CESTAT Ahmedabad rules service recipients in India not liable for service tax when the foreign service provider has a permanent establishment in India.
CESTAT rules against imposing penalties on Amglo Resources Pvt Ltd for alleged COO misdeclaration, emphasizing the need for mens rea proof.
CESTAT Ahmedabad imposes penalties under Customs Act for fraudulent MEIS benefit claim by Fashion Accessories, highlighting stringent legal consequences.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules non-inclusion of transportation costs in assessable value doesn’t justify denying CENVAT Credit, providing relief to APAR Industries Ltd.
In a recent ruling, CESTAT Ahmedabad states larger limitation period inapplicable for de-bonding after verification & issuance of no dues certificate.
CESTAT Ahmedabad emphasizes the importance of evidence in rejecting bill of entry values in Deeplalit Enterprise P Ltd Vs C.C.-Ahmedabad case.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in Asia Shipping Services vs. C.C.-Kandla case, dropping penalty for dual CHA licenses due to procedural lapses. Detailed analysis provided.
Read about CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Indian Farmers Fertiliser Co Operative Ltd Vs C.C. Kandla, allowing amendment on bill of entry u/s 149 of Customs Act before final assessment.
Dive into the dispute of classifying imported goods – natural Calcite Powder or precipitated Calcium Carbonate? Explore the impact of lab testing limitations in Acme vs C.C.-Mundra case.
CESTAT Ahmedabad dismisses plea for extended limitation in Karnavati Car Air Conditioners case. Detailed analysis of value determination for CVD in Bill of Entries.
