Reliance Industries Limited Vs CCIT (Bombay High Court) Respondent no.1, by letter dated 21st October 2020, replied to petitioner’s application dated 15th April 2020 that petitioner was eligible / entitled to avail the benefit of DTVSV (Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas) Act in accordance with law. Following the said communication, petitioner filed 27 applications for […]
HC held that the IT Department is not entitled to issue notice against the Corporate Debtor for unpaid tax claims after the approval of the resolution plan by the adjudicating authority.
Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd. Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court) Section 215 of the Act makes it clear that the Assessee is required to pay interest where he has paid advance tax less than 75% of the assessed tax, the Assessee is required to pay simple interest @ 15% p.a. from the first day of […]
Pune Saraf Association & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) It is an admitted and undisputed position that currently, there are insufficient Hallmark Centres in the country. This, according to us, is a decisive factor to be taken into consideration at the interlocutory hearing of this Writ Petition. Whilst we appreciate […]
PCIT Vs Mount Kellett Capital Management India Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Entire exercise of making transfer pricing adjustments on the basis of comparables is nothing but a matter of estimate of a broad and fair guess-work of the authorities based on factual relevant materials brought before the authorities, i.e., the TPO or Dispute Resolution […]
SPL Gold India Private Limited Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) We have also considered the Assessment Order. It is true that between 20/05/2021 and 25/05/202 1 there was a lockdown in Mumbai and 22/05/2021 and 23/05/2021 were holidays. Therefore, even with a superhuman effort, Petitioner would not have been able to file the huge number […]
Milestone Brandcom Private Limited Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (Bombay High Court) 1. This is another matter where Court’s precious judicial time is spent due to utter disregard for orders and remarkable ineptitude of the Assessing Officer. 2. Petitioner was served with a draft Assessment Order dated 06/05/2021 with a notice by which Petitioner was […]
Assessment order could not have been passed by the Assessing Officer without granting an opportunity to respondent to defend his position or cross-examine the two persons on whose affidavits, the Assessing Officer had relied upon to conclude that respondent had made certain purchases from those persons identified as Hawala Traders.
PCIT Vs JK Surface Coatings Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) The only issue that comes up for consideration is with respect to the extent of ad-hoc disallowance to be sustained with respect to bogus purchases. The AO has observed 100% of the purchase value to be added to the income of Assessee, the CIT(A) has […]
Coca-Cola India Private Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court) Revenue relied upon a Bombay HC judgment in Crompton Greaves Ltd. V/s. ACIT to submit that even if the reason for reopening does not specifically state that there was any failure on the part of petitioner to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for […]
