Follow Us:

Bombay High Court

Penalty notice without specifying that it is for ‘furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income’ or for ‘concealment of income’ is fatal

February 5, 2017 3093 Views 0 comment Print

These Appeals under Section 260­A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), challenge a common order dated 11th October, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The common impugned order deleted the penalty imposed upon the Respondent­ Assessee for the Assessment Years 2003­04, 2004­05, 2005­06 and 2006­-07.

Sec 54EC exemption on advance invested before Final Sale?

January 31, 2017 3702 Views 0 comment Print

Where An Assessee Makes Investment In The Specified Bonds On Receipt Of Advance As Per An Agreement To Sale, Whether He Is Entitled To Claim The Benefit Under Section 54EC Of The Income Tax Act, 1961? Yes

Mark to Market Losses cannot be disallowed unless incurred in respect of speculative contracts

January 28, 2017 2487 Views 0 comment Print

HC held that mark to market loss in respect of forward contracts claimed as loss from business income cannot be disallowed as the forward contracts were secured for to cover variation in foreign exchange rate which would impact its business of import and export of diamonds.

Facts recorded by ITAT cannot be contradicted by affidavit or otherwise

January 25, 2017 775 Views 1 comment Print

It is settled position in law that statement of fact recorded in the order of the Court/Tribunal has to be accepted as correct and conclusive. It cannot be contradicted by affidavit or otherwise

Non-supply of reasons to reopen assessment makes such notice bad in law

January 23, 2017 3838 Views 1 comment Print

Bombay HC held that supplying of reasons for reopening assessment is a jurisdictional requirement and non-supplying of same when assessee specifically asked for same would made reassessment notice bad in law.

Section 54EC eligible on Investment in specified bonds out of advance payment

January 12, 2017 2773 Views 0 comment Print

This Appeal under Section 260­A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act)challenges the order dated 28th June, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order is in respect of Assessment Year 2008­-09.

Reduced Recovery of Loan Advanced, Allowable as Deduction as Business Loss

December 30, 2016 3487 Views 0 comment Print

Whether Tribunal was correct in holding that loss on sale of actionable claim by assessee was a business loss allowable as a deduction?

Unintentional errors in filling appeal should be overlooked and be disposed -off on merits

December 28, 2016 4354 Views 0 comment Print

Bombay HC held that an unintentional error on the part of assessee while filling an appeal, more so when the department also acted ignoring the error, would not result in rejecting assessee’s appeal being time barred.

Service revenue need not to be include service tax-Sec 145A(a)(ii) not applicable to service revenue

December 24, 2016 2704 Views 0 comment Print

Sec 145A(a)(ii) has no applicability on service revenue which follows that service revenue need to be inclusive of service tax. It also held that service tax which has not even been claimed as deduction cannot be disallowed by recasting profit and loss account of assessee.

Expense on maintaining brand & /or corporate image is revenue expense

November 30, 2016 2095 Views 0 comment Print

If the expenditure consists of merely facilitating the assessee to carry on business more profitably leaving the fixed capital untouched, it would be on revenue account.

Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930