The contributions to National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) and District Mineral Foundation (DMF) qualify as consideration towards supply of mining service by Andhra Pradesh Government and they being includible under value of supply, are chargeable to GST under the Reverse Charge Mechanism in the hands of the applicant, i.e., service recipient.
In re Lakshmi Tulasi Quality Fuels (GST AAAR Andhra Pradesh) Appellant has let out her building on a monthly rental basis of Rs.7,20,000/- that consists of 73 rooms with all amenities like exhaust fans, geysers, lights and fittings, sanitary fittings, etc., provided by the Lessor and the lessee shall pay all operational costs to the […]
In re Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. (LIH) (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) The supply of mud engineering services along and supply of imported mud chemicals and additives are different supplies and do not constitute composite supply. In the instant case, the appellant uses certain specialized equipment / tools for drilling oil and gas wells in offshore […]
In re Beumer India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Haryana) Sub-Section (2) of Section 56 of Income Tax Act 1961 taxes sums received under the Head ‘Income from Other Sources’. Clause (vii)(a) of sub-section (2) of Section 56 includes the sum of money where it exceeds Rupees 50000/- received by an Individual or an HUF without […]
In re A Raymond Fasteners India Pvt. Ltd (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Maharasthra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling set aside the Advance Ruling No. GST-ARA-47/2019-20/B-33, dated 17.03.2020, pronounced by the MAAR. Further hold that the impugned goods, i.e., Metal Nuts with metrical threading, Metal Nuts without metrical threading, and Metal Spring Nuts, will be considered […]
As it has been established that the impugned product टShatarnrut Chyavan’ is an animal feed having specific use, viz.- increasing the milk production of the cattle and increasing the immunity of the cattle to fight diseases, and the said impugned product is also known in the market as the cattle feed supplement only, therefore, the said impugned product would be classified as animal feed supplement, and accordingly would merit classification under the Chapter Heading 2309 and under the Tariff Item 2309 90 10, and would not attract any GST in terms of SI. No. 102 of the Notification No. 2/2017-C.T. (Rate), dated 28.06.2017.
In re Kakatiya Cement Sugar & Industries Ltd (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) 1. Can the tax paid at wrong jurisdiction be appropriated and 2. Refund of accumulated GST paid on Lime Stone Royalty under RCM. Applicant sought Advance Ruling on questions of ‘appropriation of taxes’ and ‘refund’ which is outside the purview of the Advance […]
In re Bharathiyar University (AAR GST Tamilnadu) Whether the services provided by the University to its constituent colleges (viz) self-financing and management colleges relating to admission to, or conduct of examination by such institution by way of affiliation fee, registration fee such as 1. Application form fees 2. Application fees (Application* Registration fee) (each course/section) […]
In re NBCC (INDIA) Limited (GST AAR Odisha) We see that the applicant has been awarded construction of Directors Bungalow, 40 nos. staff Quarters, 84 nos Faculty Quarters in the IIT Campus, Bhubaneswar. We also observe that the civil construction of residential quarters is not the primary work entrusted to IIT, Bhubaneswar. Accordingly, we fail […]
In re Compass Group (India) Support Services Private Ltd. (GST AAR Telangana) In the reference 1st cited, M/s. Compass Group (India) Support Services Private Limited, has sought certain clarification by filing an application for Advance Ruling. Through the reference 2nd cited, All the Joint Commissioner(CT), All Deputy Commissioners(CT), All the Assistant Commissioners(CT), All the Senior […]