The value of diesel filled free of cost (FOC) by the service recipient is not includable in the value of the GTA service proposed to be provided by the Applicant in the facts and circumstances of the present application subject to conditions as mentioned in draft Transport Service Agreement/ contract incorporated in the body of this decision/ruling.
CAAR held that Creative Touch 5-series Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) (Model-5652RK, 5752RK, 5862RK) merit classification under sub heading 8471 4190 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
TC77 series touch computer, which is a handheld mobile computer used for asset inventory management purposes, Singapore Customs ruled (ref. No. CRL-211217-0036) that the product is classifiable under subheading 84713090. Therefore, notwithstanding the WCO classification advice to the contrary, it is my considered opinion that the devices under consideration are not classifiable as smartphones. They merit classification under subheading 84713090.
No ruling can be given on above two Questions, since the applicant is recipient of in respect of supplies involved in the aforesaid questions.
Reimbursement by Industry Partner to applicant, of stipend paid to trainees, does not attract tax under GST Act
PV DC Cables manufactured and supplied by Leoni Cable Solutions (India) Pvt Ltd to its Customers liable to CGST at 18%.
In re MEK Peripherals India Pvt Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra) Incentives received for market services within India cannot be considered as trade discount nor export service The AAR, Maharashtra in the matter of M/s. MEK Peripherals India Pvt. Ltd., [Advance Ruling No. GST-ARA-59/2020-21/B-56 dated April 27, 2022] has held that incentives received by the Indian […]
ITC is admissible to Vadilal, on GST paid on GTA service supplied to it, despite the fact that refrigerated vehicles travelled empty during the return journey as Vadilal has paid an agreed freight to the GTA for its service and this agreed freight was inclusive of both onward and return journey (round trip).
In re Singareni Collieries Company Limited (GST AAR Telangana) Q1. Whether royalty paid in respect of Mining Lease can be classified under “Licensing services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and evaluation falling under the heading 9973 attracting GST at the same rate of tax as applicable on supply of like goods […]
In re Singareni Collieries Company Limited (GST AAR Telangana) Q1. Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant is obliged to pay GST on the forest permit fee paid by it under reverse charge mechanism? A1. Yes, GST is payable on forest permit fee on reverse charge basis. Q2. Alternatively, if GST […]
