In re Arinem Consultancy Services PVT LTD (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Q-1 We hold that the Services rendered under the Contract with State Urban Development Agency, Uttar Pradesh (SUDA) , and for PMAY are in relation to Functions Entrusted to Municipalities under Article 243 W and to Panchayats under Article 243 G of the Constitution of […]
In re Tianyin Worldtech India Private Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Q-1 The Applicant has approached the authority of Advance ruling to determine the admissibility of input Tax Credit of Tax paid on cost proposed to be incurred in relation to Activity mentioned ? Ans-1 The input Tax Credit of Tax paid on cost Proposed to […]
In re Dr. Willmar Schwabe (I) Private Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Q-1 Whether ITC is available to the Applicant on GST charged by service provider on hiring of bus, having seating Capacity of more than thirteen person for transportation of employees to & from workplace. Ans-1 ITC is available to the Applicant only after […]
In re UP State Bridge Corporation Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Q-1 Centage Included in total value of work done taxable or not under the CGST Act, 2017 ? Ans-1 Centage will be Included in the value of supply and the same is taxable under the CGST Act, 2017. Q-2 Whether Labor Cess is Taxable or not […]
In re Surya Ayurved (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Q-1 Applicable G.S.T rate on Himsa Plus Oil, which is a ayurvedic Hair oil used for various hair disease and headache)? Ans-1 Himsa Plus Oil merits Classification under Chapter heading 3305.90 and attracts G.S.T @ 18% (CGST 9% and SGST 9%). FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY […]
In re Lucknow Producers Cooperative Milk Union Ltd. (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Q-1 GST liability on reimbursement of Employee Provided Fund & ESI? Ans-1 GST is liable to be paid @ 18% (9% CGST & 9% SGST) on the Reimbursement of EPF and ESI contribution as the same is liable to be included in the value of […]
The application is not admitted, under Section 98(2) read with Section 95(a) of CGST Act, 2017/UPGST Act, 2017 for the reason that the applicant has raised questions as a recipient of service
In re INOX Air Products Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Tamilnadu) The final issue to be seen is that whether the entire manufacturing plant is to be construed as a ‘Plant and machinery’. As discussed in para supra, the Act do not define the terms ‘Plant’, ‘Machinery’, though the provision under Section 17(3) (d) says,- ‘goods […]
In re Mahindra Splendour CHS Ltd (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1:- Whether the applicant is liable to pay GST on the contribution received from its members? Answer: – Answered in the affirmative. Question 2:- If yes, whether the applicant can avail the benefit of exemption under entry no. 77 of Notification No. 12/2017-CTR dated 28.06.2017 for the […]
(Rent for locker provided in bus stand by the appellant) it is held to be an activity undertaken by the Municipality as a function entrusted under 243W of the Constitution and the service of rent or fee collection for such a facility is neither a Supply of Goods nor a supply of Service as per Notification No. 14/2017-CT (Rate).
