Bharat Mint And Allied Chemicals Vs Commissioner Commercial Tax (Allahabad High Court) The stand taken by the respondents in the counter affidavit that the writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Act, can also not be accepted inasmuch as it is settled law […]
Daujee Abhushan Bhandar Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court) Considering the provisions of Section 282 and 282 A of the Act, 1961 and the provisions of Section 13 of the Act, 2000 and meaning of the word “issue” we find that firstly notice shall be signed by the assessing authority and then […]
Gamma Gaana Limited Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court) GST Refund Application cannot be rejected on mere ground of delay in the light of Supreme Court Order – High Court of Allahabad The Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad has declared in Gamma Gaana Limited Vs. Union of India & 3 others in Writ Tax […]
High Court held that in absence of specific allegations about the applicant he cannot be prosecuted for any offence under section 138 N.I. Act (Cheque Bounce Case).
GST registration once granted could be cancelled only if one of the five statutory conditions was found present. Per se, no GST registration may be cancelled by merely describing the firm that had obtained it, was ‘bogus’.
Allahabad High court held that granting of anticipatory bail does not arise for an offence which is bailable and a direction for the same can be issued only in respect of non-bailable and cognizable offences, the present anticipatory bail application deserves rejection and, accordingly, it is rejected.
Yashpal Vs State of U.P. and Another (Allahabad High Court) clause (e) of sub-Section (1) of Section 72 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910 provides that whenever an offence is punishable under this Act, every animal, cart, vessel or other conveyance used in carrying such receptacle or package shall be liable to The power of confiscation […]
Akhilesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) Question before the court is whether during confiscation proceedings under section 72 of U.P. Excise Act, the Magistrate is empowered to release the vehicle. In case of (Nand vs. State of U.P.) 1997 (1) AWC 41 and (Rajeev Kumar Singh vs. State of U.P. and ors) […]
Hasmukh Prajapati Vs Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. (Allahabad High Court) Facts- There was a dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent with regard to payments in respect of an apartment. When the matter reached the stage of Arbitration, the Petitioner claimed that, as per the agreement, in case of any dispute arising between the parties, […]
The BOB had already received the entire amount and, written an application to the Recovery Officer for cancellation of the sale process, but despite that the Recovery Officer had proceeded to confirm the sale wholly illegally and unauthorizedly.
