The issue under consideration is whether disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) made by AO forming an opinion that interest bearing funds were withdrawn from the firm being capital withdrawn by the partners and interest free advances is justified in law?
Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The assessee is a non-resident banking company which carries on the business of banking and other related activities through its branches in India in accordance with the provisions of Banking Regulation Act, 1949. During the year, Indian Permanent Establishment (in short PE) of the assessee bank in […]
Disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D could not exceed tax free income earned by assessee. Therefore, AO was directed to restrict disallowance made on account of the common administrative expenses to the amount of exempt dividend income actually earned by the assessee during the year under consideration.
The issue under consideration is whether the CIT(A) is correct in disallowing the provision for warranty of mobile phone merely on the basis of improvement in technology is justified in law?
Arun Kumar B M Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The Assessing Officer held that the assessee is required to invest Rs.50 lakh in REC Bonds in any financial year. The Assessing Officer also relied on the amendments made to section 54EC of the I.T.Act vide Finance Act, 2014 w.e.f. 01.04.2015. Assessee has filed this appeal before […]
Explore Angul Sukinda Railway Ltd. vs ITO case. ITAT Cuttack decision on interest treatment for FDR and Flexi deposits. Full judgment details here.
Order of the PCIT cancelling the registration since inception, u/s 12AA(3) was legally not valid as no material was being referred by PCIT and its applicability to any of the provisions of Section 2(15) and/or Section 12AA(3) while revoking the registration.
Himalaya Drug Company Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) We noticed that the assessee has exported finished goods to its AEs located in various Countries and the AEs have only marketed the goods. Since the finished goods exported by the assessee are drugs and beauty care items, the assessee was required to comply with the requirement of […]
Canvera Digital Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) From the details filed, Ld.AO observed that, assessee had computed the value as per DCF method and that there was nothing to suggest that DCF method was an appropriate method to value the shares. Ld.AO rejected DCF method adopted by assessee for the reasons that cash […]
Dell International Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs JCIT (ITAT Bangalore) We find that before us, there are 3 grievances of the assessee. The first grievance is regarding assessee’s request for exclusion of comparable M/s. Comp-U-Learned Tech India Ltd. The second grievance is regarding assessee’s request for exclusion of CAT Technology Ltd. The third grievance of […]
