Balvinder Kumar Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) There is no dispute that the case of the assessee was picked up for scrutiny under the category of limited scrutiny. This fact is established from the assessment order and also the notice issued under section 143(2) of the Act. CBDT instructions and the letter clearly establish that it’s […]
M/s Boutique International Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Assessment Invalid if Notice Under Section 143(2) Issued by DCIT Instead of ITO if Returned Income Below 30 Lakh as Per CBDT Instruction No.1/2011 for Corporate Assessee We find that assessee filed its return of income u/s. 139(1) of the Act on 29.8.2013 and the AO […]
Nirpan Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) We find that the issue in dispute herein is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Sesa Goa Ltd., vs. JCIT reported in 117 Taxmann.com 96 wherein the Hon’ble High Court had categorically held that education cess paid on […]
ADP Private Ltd. Vs CIT (ITAT Hyderabad) With regard to the working capital adjustment, it is the case of the assessee that the provision of bad and doubtful debts should be considered as operating expenses while computing the PLI. He submitted that the transactions can be considered as a comparable only after making adjustments to eliminate […]
Bangalore Turf Club Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Banglore) Assessing Officer argued that the Finance Act, 2001 has inserted the words ‘card game or other game of any sort’ in Section 194B of the Act which will even cover the “stake money” which is otherwise not covered by Section 194BB of the Act. We find that […]
Empire Infraspace India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Actually, the premises in question was on rent earlier with the HDFC Bank. Under the compelled circumstances, the tenant HDFC Bank vacated the premises because the Metro Rail Project came before the premises, therefore, the said premise was vacated by Bank. On similar circumstances, the Hon’ble […]
Hindustan Tin Works Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The Explanation -2 has been inserted below the section 37 (1) of the Act with effect from 01/04/2015 i.e. assessment year 2015-16. According to the said Explanation, corporate social responsibility expenditure incurred shall not be deemed to be incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business […]
Where the assessee company demolished the existing structure of building which was situated on the leasehold land, for constructing a new factory, and since there was no other asset in the block of assets, therefore, written down value of the said building claimed as short-term capital loss, was rightly allowed by Commissioner (Appeals).
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi) OTS E-Solutions Pvt. Ltd.: From the perusal of the records it can be seen that OTS E-Solutions Pvt. Ltd. was held as not comparable in subsequent assessment year i.e. A.Y. 2014-15 by the Tribunal. The functional dissimilarity is apparent on record and there are no changes […]
Achal Gupta Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow) Documents clearly demonstrates that assessee had purchased shares through Brokers for which the payment was made through banking channels. The assessee had sold shares through authorized stock broker and payment was received through baking channels after deduction of STT. On Page 16 which is a copy of Bank account […]
