Liability under section 201(1A), which could only proceed on the foundational assumption that tax was deductible at source by the person making payment in question, will end up exonerating the person, in whose hands the income is taxable, of liability under section 234B.
G. Dasaratharami Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) There is no dispute with regard to the fact that the ‘Agreement to sell’ dated 14.12.2007 contains the clause that the balance amount of Rs.16.50 lakhs shall be paid to the seller after obtaining occupancy certificate and also after giving possession of the property. There is also no […]
Since the revision proceedings u/s 263 had been apparently triggered only based on borrowed satisfaction i.e Audit Objection and not based on independent application of mind by PCIT therefore, the revision order passed by PCIT u/s 263 was hereby directed to be quashed.
Since assessee was a recipient of income in India after deduction of commission by the buyer outside India and no income had been received or paid inside India, which attracted TDS deduction in India, therefore, assessee was not liable to deduct TDS in India.
TPO determined ALP on the combined accounts approach rather than the split approach adopted by assessee as assessee failed to substantiate such common material costs were properly allocated segment-wise and Transfer Pricing Adjustment made at entity level should be restricted to international transactions only.
ITAT Delhi ruling on Amarjeet Kaur vs ACIT case. Disputed capital gains on property sale. Appeal outcome explained.
ITO Vs Suresh Babu Vasireddy (ITAT Hyderabad) The assessee is basically engaged in the business as a real estate agent in Hyderabad deriving commission income. The modus operandi of the business activity is that of identifying properties for sale in Hyderabad and simultaneously identify the interested buyers and sell the properties with a marginal profit. […]
Yagnesh Dayabhai Vyas Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Ld. A.R. cited a judgment of ITAT Delhi Bench in the matter of Smt. Sudha Loyalka vs. ITO where A.O. made addition to assessee’s income under section 69C in respect of amount payable to creditors towards purchases, in view of fact that said purchases were duly recorded in […]
Jagdish Arora Vs ITO (ITAT Agra) Long Term Capital Gain on compulsory acquisition – Taxability Event – and applicability of RFCTLARR Act 2013 – Whether the compensation received on account of Compulsory Acquisition by Government is exempt under provision of Section 96 of RFCTLRR Act 2013 – if the land acquired prior to applicability of […]
A.T. Kearney Ltd. Vs ADIT (ITAT Delhi) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (herein after referred to as “ITAT”), Delhi Bench vide it’s Order dated 20.05.2021 have observed that the assessment completed under Section 144C(13)/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as “Act”) is barred by limitation as Section 144C of the […]
